Filed under: A New Site, Blogroll, Breathing, Essential Reading, Food Preparation & Recipes, Full Books, Further Exploration, Grains, Health, Injuries & Recovery, Lifestyle, News and Announcements, Nutritious Nutrition, Rhabdomyolysis, The Library, The Lumber, aging, bodyweight, fitness, gymnastics, scientific papers, sleep, training/workout examples
Well, it’s official. I am now going to fully stop posting here and will solely update the new site. Visit me at www.distincthealth.com! I am still finalizing everything, but the site itself works, looks good and has all of the functionality as this one. More to come!
I assume you’re reading this article because you desire to know the ’secret’ to doing tons of pull-ups, or to doing well any exercise for that matter. Well I’ve got a method here thanks to Pavel Tsatsouline over on DragonDoor that will have you making Marines cry in a matter of months.
Here’s the thing though, it’s not some crazy secret supplement or new training method. In fact, it’s common sense! To be able to perform rep after rep, just do more of them, more often!
Pavel writes of an experience where he uses this method to enable his father-in-law to break his old Marine Corps personal record:
Just a couple of months earlier I had put my father-in-law Roger Antonson, incidentally an ex-Marine, on a program which required him to do an easy five chins every time he went down to his basement. Each day he would total between twenty-five and a hundred chin-ups hardly breaking a sweat. Every month or so Roger would take a few days off and then test himself. Before you knew it, the old leatherneck could knock off twenty consecutive chins, more than he could do forty years ago during his service with the few good men!
It’s amusing and quite easy, but it works extremely well. Most people don’t think of such obvious solutions. They’re sitting around doing reverse curls and cable pull-downs until the cow’s come home and not achieving any worthwhile results. He claims the five keys to success are intensity, repetitions, volume, frequency and exercise selection. Sounds redundant, but it’s not. He lays it all out simply and with much humor in the actual article, entitled ‘Greasing the Groove‘, so go read it!
Filed under: Health, The Lumber, bodyweight, fitness, gymnastics, training/workout examples
Yesterday’s bout of death was a crazy 30 Muscle-ups for time, or 120 pull-ups and 120 dips if you cannot do the MU or don’t have proper equipment. I’m not sure whether I agree that 4 pull-ups and 4 dips is an effective replacement for 1 muscle up for me personally, as I can do 1 muscle-up (however silly I may look) and the level of exhaustion feels more like 2 explosive dip/PU combinations. Needless to say, I only did half of the RX’d substitution explosively and by bringing myself back from the dead many times. I am the new Lazarus of bodyweight training.
Today’s workout is easy and something I never thought I’d see from CrossFit: Run 5k!
I think I’m going to do 5 – 10 miles on my road bike instead.
Crossfit posted this really great site by John Gill today which has a lot of ‘feats of strength’ on it, such as the one armed chin using only the little finger, etc. Now that’s TRUE strength! Really motivational!!
Today’s workout was almost a puker:
Complete as many rounds in 20 minutes as you can of:
5 Pull-ups
10 Push-ups
15 Squats
I got around 18 or 19, I can’t remember. First I warmed up with some agility work (think obstacle course without the fun); then the ‘workout’; and then I did some handstand stuff, one set of weighted dips and calf raises. I was so toasted afterward that I just sat on a chair outdoors and sipped water for 10 minutes.
I found this article, by Kelly Baggett, over at the UK Parkour Assoc’s website. It’s pretty in-depth and rather interesting. Enjoy!
Workout Templates For Various Athletes
by: Kelly BaggettGeneral Guidelines and Principles:
1. The body does not know whether you’re doing a higher-faster-sports, westside, HIT, swiss ball, kettlebell, or any other training system. It only knows stimulation and recovery. Most training schemes do provide some stimulation and no routine is perfect.
1a. Exercises and routines are just “tools” to improve performance. No tool is more important then whether or not the tool gets the job done. If your car breaks down, it doesn’t matter if you use a rock, a crescent wrench, bailing wire, or an entire set of snap on tools to fix it, the important thing is that it gets fixed. Raising performance is the same.
1b. Most people probably tend to use too many “tools” per training session. Improvement in mobility means you move more freely and easily, improvement in speed work means you run faster in a straight line, improvement in agility means you get better at moving while changing direction, improvement in plyo work means you tend to get better at jumping, while improvement in strength means you get better at developinig tension typically demonstrated by an ability to lift heavier loads or to lift your bodyweight more effectively. It doesn’t necessarily take a boatload of tools to improve those qualities. The ability for the human organism to adapt to stimulation existed prior to the invention of all the high-tech training tools we have today. Stimulation for the indiginous people that inspired g. hubert, r. belle and d. belle consisted of dealing with everyday life (chasing prey, running away from predators, lifting rocks to build a hut etc.) You could take a knowledgeable athlete today and put him on a deserted island, and, if he knew what he were doing and had enough food, he could stimulate performance improvements without a single modern day tool to work with.
1c. The ultimate goal should be to get your knowledge of “stimulation” and “recovery” down so well that you can program your body like a computer and know what happens in advance. (Example: Adjust this, adjust that, insert this, delete that, and here’s what’s gonna happen.)
1d. Most people do too much overanalyzing of various training minutia and not enough actual training. In in doubt, pick 3 or 4 things and get really good at them.
1e. If combining strength training, speed, agility, plyo, etc. into one workout, always do the faster stuff first. (ex. dynamic mobility followed by speed followed by plyo followed by weights)
1f. If workouts are separated into AM and PM sessions you have some leeway as to what you do first (strength and/or speed)
2. Volume of plyo, speed, and agility work should always be regulated based upon performance. As soon as performance or speed starts to decline on a main movement (assuming you’re taking full rest intervals, which you should), stop the workout. (It’s as simple as that).
2a. For speed work you should rarely ever run distances greater than 50+ yards.
2b. A set of plyo, speed, or agility work should rarely exceed 10 seconds in duration.
2c. The choice of drills chosen for plyo and agility work is not that important in the grand scheme of things. Plyo consists of unilateral and bilateral (1 and 2 leg) hops, jumps and bounds (they all do the same thing). Agility consists of moving forwards, sideways and backward and changing direction. A simple jump for height is one of the best plyo maneuvers there is. Basic change of direction drills will get the job done for agility. If you train parkour as frequently as two times per week, chances are your needs for specific plyo and agility training are low.
2d. With that being said, you know that speed work should consist of sprints for 0 to 50 yards, plyo work consists of hops, jumps, and bounds for less then 10 seconds, while agility work consists of moving forward, sideways, and backward with changes of direction for less then 10 seconds per set. You also know that a workout for any of those qualities should be terminated when performance declines due to fatigue. So how difficult is it really to design and implement a plyo, speed, and agility workout? Not very.
3. Monitoring volume strictly by “performance” on strength work is not such an issue, as muscle growth stimulation is often a goal and does require a certain level of fatigue, which means the load that you can lift at the end of a session may not be the same as the load you lift at the beginning of a strength session, (which is not true when targeting speed, agility and plyo improvements). Two to five sets per strength movement is the norm.
3a. An upper body strength workout would generally consist of some type of upper body push (bench press variation), some type of pull (row or pullup), along with perhaps some supplemental shoulder and “beach” (aka arm) work.
3b. A lower body strength workout would generally consist of some type of squat or deadlift (squat, deadlift, lunge, split squat), along with some type of assistance movement for the glutes and hams.
3c. For strength and power, sets of 3-5 reps are optimal. For hypertrophy, sets of 5-12 are typically optimal.
3d. For strength development heavy loads of 85%-100% (of your 1RM) for sets of 1-5 reps are optimal. For power development lighter loads of 10-60% are optimal.
3e. As a general recommendation, each strength training workout you do may consist of one core strength or power movement for sets of 1-5 reps along with 1 or 2 assistance movements for 5-12 reps, and maybe an ab movement for 2-4 sets of 10-20 reps.
3f. The need for upper body “power” work using loads of 10-60% is virtually nonexistent for any athletes other then powerlifters. With regards to upper body work, an athlete should be lifting heavy focusing on getting stronger and/or bigger.
3g. Until an athlete has a base of lower body strength in place (1.5 to 2 x bw squat and deadlift), specific lighter lower body “power” work in the weight room using loads of 10-60% is also largely useless. These people should concentrate on core movements with progressively heavier bar weights with an emphasis on getting stronger and/or bigger.
3h. Most people will make excellent gains with two upper body workouts per week and either 1 or 2 lower body workouts per week. Beginners seem to progress fastest with 3 of each per week.
3i. Ab work might consist of weighted crunches, standing pulldown abs, kneeling pulldown abs, decline leg raises, hanging leg raises, cable wood chops, russian twists, dumbell and cable side bends, side bends lying sidways in back extension device.
4. Generally speaking, it’s benefical for intermediate and advanced athletes to take a day of rest in between high intensive training elements. High intensive training elements include the aforementioned speed, plyo, agility, and strength work. For younger athletes (<16 years old), beginners (less then one year of training experience), and those who are just introducing the training of certain motor qualities into their routines (ex: a powerlifter introducing speed and agility work), high intensive elements can be done more often.
4a. With regard to strength work, it’s usually beneficial to take an “unloading” week ever 3 to 6 weeks. There are many ways of implementing this. probably the simplest is to cut your volume in half and decrease the load keeping things very easy. I generally prescribe something like 3 sets of 3 reps at 80% for strength work during an unloading week.
4b. Providing you can benefit from specific “power” work, it can often be advantageous to alternate 2-4 weeks of heavy strength oriented training (heavy squats and deadlifts for 3-5 reps) with 2-4 weeks of explosive oriented training (speed box squats with 50-60%, jump squats etc.)
5. Skill work and conditioning can be done on alternate days.
6. It can often be advantageous to transition from a 4-8 week phase of higher volume and/or greater training frequency into a phase of lower/volume and/or frequency.
7. If you’re training consistently yet not making consistent progress or you’re regressing, chances are 10 to 1 you’re doing too much. If in doubt reduce volume and simplify your programming.
Basic workout templates: (more…)
I found a really cool article/interview with gymnastics Coach Christopher Sommer a while ago on T-Nation and figured I’d post it here for you all to read. The author, by the way, is Chris Shugart. Enjoy!
It happens every four years. Bodybuilders and fitness buffs around the world marvel at the physiques of the male gymnasts competing in the Olympics. Those huge, muscular arms! Those broad shoulders! Those tiny waists! Those sexy, tight buns, like two bowling balls in a satin pillowcase… uh, um, let’s move on, shall we?
And then we all think the same thing: “Hmm, wonder how those guys train? What kind of weight training do they perform?”
Well, the answers may shock you. T-Nation recently sat down with Christopher Sommer, a gymnastic coach who’s responsible for building many of those amazing physiques you see on TV.
T-Nation: Coach, let’s get started by talking a little about who you are and what you do. So, who the heck are you and what the heck do you do?
Coach Sommer: I’m a former competitive gymnast and for many years now my primary focus has been on preparing athletes for the USA Junior National Gymnastics Team. Currently I run the men’s competitive program at the Desert Devil Gymnastics National Team Training Center.
T-Nation: Okay, every time the Olympics roll around, bodybuilders and fitness buffs go monkeynuts over the physiques of the male gymnasts. What’s the biggest thing about their training that would surprise most gymrats?
Sommer: That their training is comprised almost entirely out of bodyweight exercises.
T-Nation: Wait a sec, these guys with the killer biceps don’t do barbell and dumbbell curls?
Sommer: No, not a single one! In fact, their amazing biceps development isn’t the result of any kind of curling movement at all, but primarily due to the straight arm leverage work which they do on the still rings.
The straight-arm work is enormously difficult and puts tremendous strain on the biceps resulting in incredible growth. The key to success is being able to approach these exercises in a safe progressive manner.
T-Nation: What do you mean exactly by straight-arm work?
Sommer: By straight-arm work I’m primarily referring to the classic strength positions on the still rings (iron cross, planche, maltese, etc.) and the connecting movements between them.
Raj Bhavsar performing an iron cross in the 2004 USA Championships
Straight arm work basically means moving the body without the advantage of bending the joints. Essentially then, by increasing the length of the lever, we greatly magnify the intensity of the exercise.
A case in point would be a cross pull (basically a straight arm pull-up where the arms pull out to the sides) compared to a regular pull-up. The bodyweight is the same in both cases; however, the cross pull is several orders of magnitude harder than the pull-up, resulting in significantly higher strength and muscle gains.
Now consider that I had one teammate in college who could hold an iron cross with 60 pounds hanging on his feet and you begin to get an idea of the incredible strength of some of the high level gymnasts. By the way, this same gymnast had an upper body that was incredibly large and ripped!
T-Nation: That’s impressive. I’ve heard stories that these athletes can lift a surprising amount of weight in the deadlift and other lifts, even though they never train these lifts. Is that true? And if it is, how’s that possible?
Sommer: Gymnastics training does indeed build incredible strength. For example, I was not a particularly strong gymnast, yet I was able to do a double bodyweight deadlift and weighted chins with almost 50% extra bodyweight on my very first weight training attempts.
One of my student’s, JJ Gregory, far exceeded my own modest accomplishments. On his first day of high school weight lifting, JJ pulled a nearly triple bodyweight deadlift with 400 pounds at a bodyweight of 135 and about 5’3″ in height. On another day, he also did an easy weighted chin with 75 pounds, and certainly looked as though he could’ve done quite a bit more. We’ll never know for sure because the cheap belt I was using at the time snapped.
Why gymnastics training results in such high levels of strength is still unclear. My personal opinion is that the secret lies in the plyometric nature of the movements. In a way this reminds me of the results experienced by Adam Archuleta, with the exception that we’re using bodyweight variations combined with straight arm work to obtain our results.
T-Nation: Most of the top male gymnasts are fairly light aren’t they? With all that muscle you’d think they’d weigh more. Can a hopeful gymnast get “too big” for the sport?
Sommer: Absolutely. World class performance is always easier to achieve with the correct phenotype. For example, most jumpers in track and field tend to be taller, while the marathon runners, for the most part, are smaller and lighter.
There are exceptions to be found in almost all sports. France’s Dmitry Karbanenko is a “giant” in gymnastics (5’8″, 170 pounds and unbelievably thick and muscular), yet he’s one of the finest gymnasts in the world. Mugsy Bogues was only 5’2″ and played in the NBA, but we all know that those exceptions are few and far between.
This isn’t a cause for despair though. Remember that the importance of having a particular body type applies to world class athletes and world class performance levels. For the fitness enthusiast and the recreational athlete, gymnastics conditioning can be of huge benefit to everyone, regardless of their size or shape.
T-Nation: I’ve added a little gymnastics training into my personal program, but honestly, is there really any hope for an adult who wants to have a build similar to these guys? I mean, is it possible with normal genetics? And is it possible for someone who didn’t start doing this stuff at age four?
Sommer: Many weightlifters of the 1940’s and 50’s (the old Muscle Beach days) believed that a combination of weight lifting and gymnastics training was required to build the ultimate physique. One of the most famous of those trainees is Jack LaLanne, a name that all of your readers should be familiar with.
Jack LaLanne in the 1940s
Many know of his reputation for incredible strength endurance records; for example, he performed 1000 pull-ups and 1000 push-ups in one hour and twenty three minutes! What they may not know is that Mr. LaLanne was also an accomplished gymnast and didn’t begin setting his amazing records until he was 43 years old and continued until well into his 70’s. In fact, not too long ago, at the age of 80+, I saw a picture of him performing one of the gymnastics specialty exercises that I use with my competitive athletes!
Also, the legendary rock climber John Gill credits his strength training on the rings for his boundary-breaking strength in the world of rock climbing. Interestingly, Mr. Gill didn’t begin training on the still rings until his freshman year in college; yet in only two years he was doing crosses, levers and butterflies (a straight arm pull-up).
In fact, Gill became so strong that he could perform seven consecutive pull-ups with his right arm and five with his left. Yet remember, he didn’t begin any organized athletic training until a young man in college.
John Gill performing a one arm front lever in the 1960s
T-Nation: Let’s say a person reading this wants to begin to do just a little of what these guys do. You say to start out with the “frog” exercise. What is that and why should we ironheads be doing it?
© 1998 — 2004 Testosterone, LLC. All Rights Reserved.



